When logs don't tell the full story

Modern systems generate countless logs, alerts, and policy decisions. Yet when teams need to answer "What actually happened?" they often find themselves piecing together incomplete narratives. Security tools report their own perspective, but they miss critical gaps: bypasses and exploits that evade detection, discrepancies between user interactions and background processes, and system-level behaviors that occur outside tool visibility. These gaps leave teams without a complete picture of system reality.

Security tools assume. Reality is more complex.

Endpoint Reality

Today's endpoints run multiple security controls simultaneously. EDR platforms monitor behavior. SIEM systems aggregate events. Policy engines enforce rules. Each tool generates logs and alerts based on what it observes and how it interprets activity.

Yet when teams need to understand what actually occurred during an incident, an audit, or a compliance review, they face a fundamental challenge: these tools report their own perspective. They don't verify endpoint reality independently.

When tools disagree, when logs conflict, or when policies don't match observed behavior, teams lack ground truth. They're left with uncertainty, guesswork, and incomplete narratives.

The missing layer: Verification

Existing security tools are essential, but they operate within their own domains. EDR focuses on threat detection. SIEM focuses on event correlation. Policy engines focus on enforcement. None of them verify what actually happened on the endpoint, independent of their own assumptions and interpretations.

This gap creates problems during critical moments:

⚠️

Incident response

Teams can't reconcile conflicting tool reports

📊

Audit Verification

Auditors can't verify the accuracy of security logs

✅

Compliance review

Can't confirm policy enforcement matches reality

🔍

Investigations

Rely on incomplete or contradictory narratives

What's needed is an independent Verification layer: a system that observes endpoint activity and builds factual timelines, separate from what security tools claim.

Logurity provides clarity

Observes endpoint activity

Records events as they occur at the system level

→

Builds factual timelines

Creates structured, verifiable logs in plain language

→

Independent Verification

Provides ground truth separate from tool claims

Logurity is a local-first endpoint reality verification engine. It observes endpoint activity and builds factual, semantic timelines that explain what happened, when it happened, and in what context, independent of what security tools report.

The system operates at the endpoint level, recording events as they occur. It creates structured, verifiable logs that describe system activity in plain language, making it possible to understand endpoint behavior without interpreting tool-specific alerts or proprietary log formats.

Logurity focuses on Verification, not detection. It doesn't replace existing security tools. Instead, it provides the missing Verification layer that helps teams understand endpoint reality when they need it most.

How it helps teams

🔍

Clarifies ambiguous incidents

When security tools report conflicting information, Logurity provides an independent timeline that helps teams understand what actually occurred.

⚖️

Reconciles policy vs reality

Verifies whether policy enforcement matches observed endpoint behavior, helping teams identify gaps and inconsistencies.

📋

Improves log trust

Provides verifiable timelines that teams can use to validate the accuracy of logs from other security tools.

📑

Supports audits

Delivers factual, independent records that auditors can use to verify security controls and compliance requirements.

🎯

Reduces guesswork

Eliminates uncertainty during investigations by providing clear, verifiable answers about endpoint activity.

🔐

Enhances transparency

Provides clear visibility into endpoint activity, enabling teams to understand system behavior without relying on tool interpretations.

What Logurity is not

To be clear about what Logurity does and doesn't do:

Not EDR

It does not detect threats or respond to security incidents.

Not SIEM

It does not aggregate or correlate security events from multiple sources.

Not DLP

It does not prevent data loss or enforce data protection policies.

Not spyware or surveillance

It does not monitor users, capture keystrokes, record screens, or collect personal information.

Not an alert-heavy system

It focuses on verification, not generating alerts or notifications.

Not a replacement

It does not replace existing security tools. It complements them with verification.

Logurity observes and records endpoint activity to build verifiable timelines. It does not block actions, interfere with operations, or make security decisions. It provides clarity, not control.

Open source and principles

Logurity is open-source by design. The source code is available for review, audit, and contribution. This transparency ensures that teams can understand exactly what the system does, how it operates, and what it records.

The project is built on core principles:

🏠

Local-first

Data remains on the endpoint by default, giving teams control over their verification records.

🔒

Privacy-aware

The system records only what's necessary for verification. No keystrokes, no packet payloads, no screen recordings, no personal data collection.

🤝

Designed for trust

Built to be inspected, understood, and verified. Not built to create fear or uncertainty.

🔍

Transparent

Open-source code enables full visibility into system behavior and data collection practices.

🛡️

Independent Verification

Provides ground truth that teams can use to verify claims from other tools and systems.

⚡

Non-intrusive

Observes and records without interfering with normal operations or blocking user actions.

Logurity exists to provide clarity and verification, not to add complexity or create new dependencies. It's infrastructure that teams can trust because they can see how it works.